The Impact of Group Psychotherapy Based on Quality of Life on Marital Commitment among Infertile Women

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Corresponding Author; Instructor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran

3 Full Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The present study has been carried out to investigate the effectiveness of group psychotherapy based on quality of life on marital commitment among infertile women. This is a quasi-experimental research work with pretest–posttest, control group design. The statistical population consisted of all the infertile women in Arak referring to Arak Royan center in 2015-2016. The sample included 32 infertile women who were put in control (n = 16) and experimental (n = 16) groups. The experimental group received 5 weekly 90-minute sessions of psychotherapy based on quality of life, while the control group received no intervention. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS software using covariance analysis. The results indicated that group psychotherapy based on quality of life affected marital commitment of infertile women and led to a significant difference between the experimental and control groups on marital commitment and its components including personal, moral and structural commitment.

Keywords

References

Adams, J.M., Jones, T. (1997). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72, 1177-1196.
Eid M, Larson RJ. The Science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford press; 2008.
Harmon, Kh. D. (2005).black men and marriage: the impact of spirituality, religiosity, and marital commitment on satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, university of Alabama.
High, Andrew C., & Steuber, Keli Ryan.(2014). an Examination of Support (In) Adequacy: Types, Sources, and Consequences of Social Support among Infertile Women. Communication Monographs, 81(2): 157-178.
Kapinus, C. A., &johnson, m. p. (2003). The utility of family life cycle as theoretical and 24(2), 155-184.
Klock, S.(2004). Psychological adjustment to twins after Infertility. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology; 18(4): 645-656.
 Martins, M.V.,  Peterson, B.D., Almeida, V., Mesquita-Guimarães, J.  & Costa, M.E.(2013).Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility. Human Reproduction, 29(1): 83-89.
Mascarenhas, M.N., Flaxman, S.R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G.A.(2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since, a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS medicine, 9(12), e1001356.
Masters, A. (2008). Marriage, commitment and divorce in a matching model with empirical tools. Commitment and family life- cycle stage. Journal of family issues, differential aging. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11, 614–628.
Mosko, J.(2009). Commitment and attachment dimensions. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: Purdue University.
Obi SN, Onah HE, Okafar II.(2009). Depression among Nigerian women following pregnancy loss. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 105(1), 602.
Ragni, G., Mosconi, P., Baldini, M.P., Somigliana, E., vegetti, W., Caliari, A.E. (2005). Health-related quality of life and need for IVF in 1000 Italian infertile couples. Human Reproduction; 20(5): 1286-91.
Tao, Peng., Coates, Rosemary & Maycock, Bruce.(2012). Investigating Marital Relationship in Infertility: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies. J Reprod Infertil; 13(2): 71–80.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 April 2017
  • Revise Date: 21 October 2017
  • Accept Date: 23 May 2018
  • Publish Date: 20 February 2019

Share

How to cite

Statistics