Construction of a Scale for the Assessment of the Harmful Effects of the Family of Origin on Engaged Couples on the Verge of Marriage and Evaluation of its Psychometric Properties

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD in Family Counselling, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Ghonbad Kavoos, Ghonbad, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to construct a scale for the assessment of the harmful effects of the family of origin on the engaged couples on the verge of marriage and evaluate its validity and reliability. To this end, at first the categories related to the scale construction were identified and the scale was formulated based on them by studying the relevant literature and conducting 19 semi-structured interviews with counselors, experts and 26 engaged couples in the form of qualitative research. Then from among the engaged couples referring to counseling centers in Tehran, 350 people were purposefully selected. To determine the reliability of this scale, Cronbach's alpha method was used, and to determine its validity, a family expressiveness questionnaire and the Family-of-Origin Health Scale were employed. The collected data were analyzed on an exploratory basis. The results of factor analysis by principal components method along with varimax rotation showed the existence of three factors including the negative role of the family of origin, unsuccessful experience in the family of origin and the negative modeling of the family of origin. These three factors explained 50.35% of the total variance of the whole sample. To evaluate the reliability of the scale and to assess the harmful effects of the family of origin, Cronbach's alpha coefficients and internal consistency methods were used. Cronbach's alpha coefficients were 0.81 for the whole test and 0.78, 0.78 and 0.75 for the subscales, respectively. Its convergent validity coefficient with the family expression questionnaire was 0.62, and its divergent validity coefficient with the Family-of-Origin Health Scale was 0.55. The conclusion is that the researcher-made scale has acceptable reliability and validity, and it can detect the detrimental effects of the family of origin in clinical research and couple therapies. The importance of this research is due to the development of a local scale appropriate to Iranian culture to identify the interventionist and harmful effects of families in marriages.

Keywords

References

Botha A, Berg HS, Venter CA. (2009). The Relationship between family of origin and marital satisfaction. Journal of Interdisciplinary Health Science. 14(1): 441-447.
Boyce, Ch., Wood, A.M., & Ferguson, E. (2016). For better or for worse: The moderating effects of personality on the marriage-life satisfaction link. Personality and Individual Differences, 97(4): 61-66.
Chen, R., & Busby, D. M. (2019). Family of origin experiences on relationship satisfaction: a mediation model. Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 80-101.
Conger RD, Cui M, Bryant CM, Elder Jr GH. (2000). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. J Pers Soc Psychol, 79(2):224-237.
Halberstadt, A. G., & Parke, R., Cassidy, J., Stifter, C. A., Fox, N. A. (1995). Self- Expressiveness within the family context: psychometric support for a new measure. Psychological Assessment, 7(1), 93-103.
Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Martel, L. D. (2007). Passionate love. Handbook of cultural psychology, 760-779.
Herr NR, Hammen C, Brennan PA. (2007). Current and past depression as predictors of family functioning: a comparison of men and women in a community sample. J Fam Psychol, 21(4): 694-702.
Jalali, B. (2005). Iranian Families. In McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J., Garcia-Preto, N. (Eds.). Ethnicity & Family Therapy (451-468). New York: Guilford Publication.
Markman HJ, Rhoades GK, Stanley SM, Ragan EP, Whitton, SW. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology. 24(3): 289-298.
Muraru, A. A., & Turliuc, M. N. (2012). Family-of-origin, romantic attachment, and marital adjustment: a path analysis model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 90-94.
Nargiso JE, Becker S, Wolff J, Uhl K, Simon V, Spirito A, et al. (2012). Psychological, peer, and family influences on smoking among an adolescent psychiatric sample. J Subst Abuse Treat, 42(3): 310-8.
Pfeifer, L., Miller, R. B., Li, T. S., & Hsiao, Y. L. (2013). Perceived marital problems in Taiwan. Contemporary Family Therapy, 35(1), 91-104.
Sadeghi, M. S., Mazaheri, M. A., Motabi, D. F., & Zahedi, K. (2012). Marital interaction in iranian couples: examining the role of culture. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(2), 281-300.
Simon VA, Furman W. Interparental conflict and adolescent's romantic relationship conflict. Journal of research on adolescence. 2010; 20(1):188-209.
Stutzman SV, Bean RA, Miller RB, Randall D, Feinaur LL, Porter C L, Moore A. (2011). Marital conflict and adolescent outcomes: A cross-ethnic group comparison of Latino and European American youth. Children & Youth Services Review. 33(5): 663-668.
 Weiss JM. (2014). Marital Preparation, Experiences, and Personal Qualities in a Qualitative Study of Individuals in Great Marriages. (MA). Utah State University, Logan.
The Women and Families Cultural-Educational
Volume 15, Issue 52
Fall Quarterly
November 2020
Pages 25-43

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 17 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 26 April 2020
  • Publish Date: 21 November 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics